Demand for change should come from the bottom up with tenants themselves setting the parameters for their own levels of participation.The previous section outlined the case for ensuring that all council tenants have the opportunity to be involved in the management of their homes and their estates.Many councils have responded to the wish of tenants to have a say in the way their homes are managed and already have in place a range of structures and arrangements at local and neighbourhood levels, Copy Writing Services including residents’ associations, tenant management organisations, estate forums, estate committees, estate agreements, service level agreements and management partnership arrangements.
Until now, however, there has been no concerted attempt to ensure that all councils are performing to the standards of the best, or that they have a clear view of what they should be aiming at and why.The result is that, despite the benefits of tenant participation, the way participation is currently put into practice varies widely.The Government believes that tenants should be empowered to choose those participation structures which best meet their wishes and capacities and that tenants should be allowed to develop these at a speed which suits them.
This will allow tenants to concentrate their efforts on those areas which are of the greatest interest and importance to them and to ensure that local decisions really reflect local priorities.The proposals are based upon existing powers exercised by councils and are designed to ensure that the management of council housing is not just a top down process.However, they recognise that councils have ultimate responsibility for deciding the direction and scope of local housing strategies and policies;
That these are influenced and constrained by requirements in legislation and that other residents, public, private and voluntary sector players are key stakeholders in the community and have an important role in helping the council to develop and implement these.The proposals in this paper do not suggest changes to these rights which are listed in Part 4 of this paper and they rely on existing powers to bring about a new climate for tenant participation.
Even if that, and the loading gauge difficulties were to be resolved the route beyond Bath towards, and beyond, Bristol does not have the necessary infrastructure or timetable capacity to handle these trains. With infrastructure enhancement at West Dean the southern part of the route, between Redbridge and Salisbury (Laverstock South Junction), could offer a reasonable alternative to the route via Southampton Central and Eastleigh.
But this would increase direct operating costs and require additional operational resources. Past work by EWS has concluded that this could not be made an economic operation. (However the potential for it to handle distribution container traffic from Southampton Docks has not previously been considered.).
There is capacity within the present infrastructure to not only run a consistent two passenger trains per hour south of Westbury but to add a third. Internet Marketing Services However it is felt that traffic might only justify such an addition south of Salisbury unless greater reasons justify extension as a through service over the entire route.
Any potential increase in the passenger train service should first be assessed against loading data and market information to ascertain if demand could be satisfied by running longer trains. The demand for a limited stop passenger train service should be assessed as a potential means of using currently available line capacity as the timings of such a train could be advantageous to mixed traffic use of the route. The potential of a terminal at Westbury to act as a container distribution base and thus relieve congestion in container handling at Southampton should be further investigated.
The MAY FAIR programme will be a morning of presentations followed by questions and discussions. The afternoon will comprise a number of workshops based on the different cultural areas, or on specific themes – for example, culture in rural areas.
Each UK participant will receive a full MAY FAIR Pack with background information on all the new Member States and their Google Local Marketing Services cultural activities, as well as a range of contact details, and a summary of funding opportunities that may be of help in order to begin to develop collaborative projects.
A new £500,000 grant scheme has recently been announced to involve a range of projects designed to regenerate the built environment. Defra would like recipients of their grants to give them frank views on the accessibility and bureaucracy associated with their rural funding streams – what works, what doesn’t and where things can be improved. In addition to providing information about the rural funding streams review, the site also incorporates a questionnaire, the results of which will assist Defra make the rural funding streams review as effective as possible. Leader + in North Northumberland provides European funding for innovative, rural development schemes initiated by the local community.
Projects to support and engage young people in local decision-making, access to advice, counselling and training, employment opportunities, and locally based training and mentoring are particularly welcomed. To be considered for eligibility, potential projects should fit within one of six development strands covering environment, culture, tourism, education, arts and crafts and food & drink. The maximum grant rate is 50%, although there is no maximum on the amount that may be applied for.